Philosophy of Language

Philosophy of Language

Share this post

Philosophy of Language
Philosophy of Language
The Economy of ‘Being’: How Tom Bombadil and Diocletian Escaped Power's Grip

The Economy of ‘Being’: How Tom Bombadil and Diocletian Escaped Power's Grip

If I am tempted by the economy of “more,” it usually means I don’t grow enough cabbages.

Eugene Terekhin's avatar
Eugene Terekhin
Oct 31, 2024
∙ Paid
37

Share this post

Philosophy of Language
Philosophy of Language
The Economy of ‘Being’: How Tom Bombadil and Diocletian Escaped Power's Grip
11
5
Share

I’ve always been intrigued by Tom Bombadil’s indifference to the Ring. Everyone else in Middle-earth was sorely tempted by it — perhaps with the exception of Faramir. It’s always a surprise when I meet someone who isn’t tempted by what tempts me. Why don’t they care? Why doesn’t it affect them?

Someone said that modern economics is built entirely on our …

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Philosophy of Language to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Eugene Terekhin
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share